The
Presidents Hoot!
Saving our Trees
1. Commissioners’ proposal to require retention or relocation of
mature oak trees in New Developments. Indian
River County citizens are increasingly aware that the community ambiance, which
prompted many of us to move to or live in IR County, as opposed to our
neighboring counties, is significantly enhanced because of our tree and wetland
habitats. Unfortunately, under the
current overly liberal tree ordinance, we are seeing daily the clear-cutting of
familiar acreage of magnificent 20- to 150- year old adult trees that are part
of our community’s heritage and environment
It is wonderful that the Indian River County
Commission is still thinking of revising the tree and landscaping ordinances to
protect our uplands and trees as much as our wetlands. Our county planning department is looking at
our two neighboring counties to see what their regulations are, but I think we
can do better than Brevard and St. Lucie County standards. We have the advantage of seeing the failure
of the counties north and south of us, and can make efforts not to follow their
mistakes. However, we have only one
chance to do it right and that opportunity for us is right now. If we do not find a solution, the trees will
be cut and lost. Brevard and St. Lucie
County probably do not have that opportunity.
We have some very precious trees and habitats in our
county. Audubon supports the county
commissioners’ recommendation that the planning staff develop an amendment to
the ordinance that adds a “replacement” or “preservation” ratio for native
trees that qualify for removal. Audubon
feels that Indian River County should have one of the best tree ordinances in
the state. However, we hope that our
planning staff will consider adopting some of the City of Gainesville and
Tallahassee standards, which have thoughtfully considered the types of trees in
their area.
In addition, Pelican Island Audubon recommends:
“Bert Harris” (taking land) has been mentioned as a
possible threat for requiring the transfer or replanting of trees. We are unaware of any case where the City of
Gainesville, home of our prestigious law school at the University of Florida
and our state’s capital, full of lawyers, has had any serious suits concerning
its tree ordinances. Gainesville and
Tallahassee are also cities that provide affordable housing for students,
teachers, and young working people in the community.
2. After the fact tree removal permits. Due to previous problems at the Palms of Vero project on 12th
Street in Vero Beach there needs to be additional rules to protect our
trees. PIAS recommends:
1. After the
fact permits are intended only for the naïve single family homeowner who is not
aware that a permit is needed
2. After the
fact permits should not be available to developers, contractors, or builders.
3. If
exceptions are allowed for any developer, contractor, or builder then there
should be an outside reviewer (the Planning & Zoning Commission) to review
the fines, other than the environmental planner who should be protected from
undue pressures.
4. Developers,
contractors and builders may go to the Code Enforcement Board to either uphold
the fines or redress a grievance.
3. Professional Services Advisory Committee (PSAC) Membership. Pelican Island Audubon strongly recommends that at
least two members of the environmental community be placed on the county’s
professional services advisory committee to provide equitable balance in the
review of county ordinances. There are
none now.
Please
write or call the County Commissioners to express your views.-Richard H. Baker,
President (November 2003)